[zeromq-dev] zmq_close() semantics and handling outstanding messages

[Andrew Hume]

i like this. and the default behaviour (depending on SO_LINGER)
would more naturally follow the expected behaviour.

On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:29 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:

>
> A straightforward behaviour for zmq_term would be to block until  
> all the
> sockets are deallocated -- each depending on it's SO_LINGER policy.
>
> (This could obviously result in deadlock on zmq_term, but that's  
> beside
> the point once again I think.)
>
> Thoughts?
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

------------------
Andrew Hume  (best -> Telework) +1 732-886-1886
andrew at research.att.com  (Work) +1 973-360-8651
AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and LOPSA



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20100709/981dbf4a/attachment.htm>