[zeromq-dev] Debian subdirectory moved to the root

Adrian von Bidder avbidder at fortytwo.ch
Fri Jan 29 11:40:28 CET 2010

On Friday 29 January 2010 08.42:21 Martin Sustrik wrote:
> Hi Adrian, Peter, Mato,
> According to you suggestions I moved packages/debian directory to
> project root.
> Adrian, please let me know what should be imported to the directory to
> make it up-to-date with current Debian package.


* Note that it's packaging 2.0beta2 and not git head.  Packaging will always 
lag behind, since I'm planning to work off tarballs and not follow git. 
(Although as long as I keep packaging beta tarballs the final diff between 
what's delivered in the tarball and what gets uploaded to Debian should be 
quite small.)

* Diff is quite big since I started unaware of Peter's work and just 
imported some bits and took ideas.

* [binary] Package name is libzmq0 instead of libzeromq0, because it's 
strongly reccommended to have soname and package name match.

* The biggest regression is of course loss of cl packaging.  OTOH cl 
bindings are not in git anymore, so no reason to still carry the 
packaging...  Ruby/Python packages that were generated by Peter's packaging 
were only placeholders in any case.

-- vbi

Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 29th day of Chaos in the YOLD 3176
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Packaging-of-2.0beta2-tarball.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 39338 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20100129/79ae118b/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 389 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20100129/79ae118b/attachment.sig>

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list