[zeromq-dev] Traffic monitoring and traffic shaping article

[Martin Sustrik]

Both resolve to 127.0.0.1, however, zmq_bind is supposed to bind to a
network interface, thus "lo" is more adequate. zmq_connect on the
other hand, connects to a host, thus "localhost" is used.

Martin

On 26/1/2010, "Steven McCoy" <steven.mccoy at miru.hk> wrote:

>Ok, from zmq_tcp(7 both are valid for bind, i.e. "tcp://lo:33333" and
>"tcp://localhost:33333", but the latter reads easier and presumably
>more portable.
>
>:-)
>
>--
>Steve-o
>
>2010/1/26 Steven McCoy <steven.mccoy at miru.hk>:
>> Is the hostname in the monsend code supposed to be a truncated "lo"?
>>
>> --
>> Steve-o
>>
>> 2010/1/25 Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com>:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Those interested in traffic monitoring and traffic shaping may find this
>>> article useful:
>>>
>>> http://www.zeromq.org/whitepapers:traffic-monitoring-v20
>>>
>>> Martin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>zeromq-dev mailing list
>zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev