[zeromq-dev] Traffic monitoring and traffic shaping article

Martin Sustrik sustrik at 250bpm.com
Tue Jan 26 07:42:18 CET 2010

Both resolve to, however, zmq_bind is supposed to bind to a
network interface, thus "lo" is more adequate. zmq_connect on the
other hand, connects to a host, thus "localhost" is used.


On 26/1/2010, "Steven McCoy" <steven.mccoy at miru.hk> wrote:

>Ok, from zmq_tcp(7 both are valid for bind, i.e. "tcp://lo:33333" and
>"tcp://localhost:33333", but the latter reads easier and presumably
>more portable.
>2010/1/26 Steven McCoy <steven.mccoy at miru.hk>:
>> Is the hostname in the monsend code supposed to be a truncated "lo"?
>> --
>> Steve-o
>> 2010/1/25 Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com>:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Those interested in traffic monitoring and traffic shaping may find this
>>> article useful:
>>> http://www.zeromq.org/whitepapers:traffic-monitoring-v20
>>> Martin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>zeromq-dev mailing list
>zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list