[zeromq-dev] Debian package / small manpage issue
Steven McCoy
steven.mccoy at miru.hk
Fri Jan 22 09:24:59 CET 2010
2010/1/22 Adrian von Bidder <avbidder at fortytwo.ch>
> OTOH: I had a very quick look at the openpgm tarball, and didn't like it
> very much. There are no installation instructions, and there seem to be 2
> build systems (scons and cmake - or do they interact?). Also, openpgm
> seems
> to be statically linked in zeromq in any case. So, for now, I guess I'll
> just leave that and use what's included with zeromq.
>
>
Hey, hey! :-)
The CMake version is from version 1, I haven't updated it yet for version 2.
I use SCons primarily for development as I find it a bit smarter than the
alternatives. All the instructions are online:
http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/wiki/OpenPgm2CReferenceProgrammersChecklist
It's recommended to use the static library for performance and
compatibility.
The scripts are a bit clunky, especially when growing in number to support
different targets. I often stumble into bugs and limitations in the
versions bundled with most distributions, the latest being a lack of support
for Intel C 11 on Linux.
It's tedious to integrate into other projects and even package, hence ZMQ
builds OpenPGM itself using Autoconf.
--
Steve-o
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20100122/aec0f19c/attachment.htm>
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list