[zeromq-dev] 0MQ/2.0-beta1 on OSX

Martin Sustrik sustrik at 250bpm.com
Mon Jan 18 08:21:43 CET 2010

Hi Asko,

> I'd see this being a matter of the sample programs (perf/*). They 
> currently do heavy asserts and stuff instead of providing meaningful 
> analysis of the fault. No ZMQ API needs changing to make the life of 
> newcomers easier.
> Maybe perf are not to be used as samples, but heck - at least to me they 
> were plenty good for that. And they are mentioned on the website, so.... 
> they are indeed samples.

Ah, understood. I've missed your point before. Perf wasn't meant to be a 
sample at the beginning - we've used it to tune the performance - but 
obviously now lot of people use it as samples. So yes, you are right. 
Error handling in perf should be made more decent.


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list