[zeromq-dev] Problems with errno on Win32
Brian Granger
ellisonbg at gmail.com
Thu Feb 18 16:32:07 CET 2010
Martin,
I am in class most of the day today, but will try this later. One
comment though: my feeling is that
if the problem I am seeing is related to thread safety, the conflict
is between the IO thread
and the app thread.
Cheers,
Brian
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Regarding the discussion we had yesterday about thread-safeness of errno
> on Win32: I've did a check today and it seems that address of errno is
> different for each thread - as it should be. I've run the test on WinXP.
> How does it look like on your system?
>
> To check it, just open thread.cpp and following piece of code on line 53:
>
> printf ("%p\n", (void*) &errno);
>
> Then run any 0MQ test with multiple I/O threads. Each I/O thread will
> print out the address of it's errno. Are they all the same?
>
> Thanks.
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
--
Brian E. Granger, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Physics
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger at calpoly.edu
ellisonbg at gmail.com
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list