[zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Add Zmq module namespace for ruby binding. Fix extconf.rb.

Chris Wong chris at chriswongstudio.com
Tue Feb 16 21:21:53 CET 2010

I'm submitting the patch with MIT license.

On Feb 12, 2010, at 6:05 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>> The suggestion on extconf.rb looks great.  I'd incorporate that.
>> IMHO, the namespace is a must, which we both agreed.  I'm open to
>> name it ZMQ rather than Zmq if you prefer that.  I don't have a
>> particular preference one way or the other.
>> In terms of API style, I think it should adhere to the basic API in
>> the C/C++/Python library.  Any extra rubyism should be wrapped on
>> top.  There are plenty of messaging abstraction library out there,
>> such as EventMachine.  It's a lot more difficult (or rather
>> cumbersome) to make the API ruby-ish at the C layer.
>> Thoughts?
>> Chris P.S.: Surprised that there is not much more opinions on the
>> ruby binding.
> Same here. Anyway, as nobody complains, I'm going to incorporate your 
> patch into ruby binding. The ZMQ namespace is definitely needed. Btw, 
> same change to Python binding was discussed on IRC yesterday.
> One thing I need is you to state that you are submitting the patch under 
> MIT license.
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list