[zeromq-dev] OpenPGM and IPv6 interfaces

Steven McCoy steven.mccoy at miru.hk
Tue Feb 2 15:15:42 CET 2010


On 2 February 2010 22:07, Martin Lucina <mato at kotelna.sk> wrote:

> I don't particulary like this approach since it depends on the node-name
> resolving to something sane and a lot of people have this set up wrong.
>
> What we've decided to do in the mean time is to force OpenPGM to AF_INET in
> OMQ and we can then revisit this discussion later when have someone who
> actually needs proper IPv6 support.
>
>
That only applies for "pgm://eth0:7500", I would presume specifying the
multicast group would be the more popular method and that forces the family
of the interface, i.e. "pgm://eth0;239.192.0.1:7500" or
"pgm://eth0;[ff08::1]:7500".

-- 
Steve-o
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20100202/7715fd76/attachment.htm>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list