[zeromq-dev] [PATCH] Re: ZMQ 2.1.0 and OpenPGM Memory Usage
Martin Sustrik
sustrik at 250bpm.com
Tue Dec 7 15:53:34 CET 2010
On 12/07/2010 03:37 PM, Bob Beaty wrote:
> Martin, Steven, et. al.,
> I've got a functioning patch for the setting of the Recovery Interval as milliseconds as opposed to seconds. It includes the changes to the docs, and while it might not be up to professional writing levels, it's accurate and complete so people can see what the new option is supposed to do.
> Of course, I've tried to follow all the guidelines in the Contributing to 0MQ page, but it's quite possible I missed a few. Sorry for that.
> Along those same lines, I'm including the patch inline as that was the requested method:
Steven, I wonder if it makes sense to ever set RECOVERY_IVL to 0. Maybe
when unreliable multicast is desired?
If so, the default for the new option should be -1 rather than 0.
Martin
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list