[zeromq-dev] 0MQ User Guide

Apps, John john.apps at hp.com
Thu Aug 12 09:45:02 CEST 2010


Well, we have a language binding (wrapper) for COBOL and other high-level langauges with 0MQ V2, so hopefully it will not be difficult to adapt that to the work currently taking place. 

Since COBOL does not allow reentrancy, i.e., multi-threaded code, 0MQ is just the thing to use as it facilitates the exchange of data without sharing it in memory structures. 

There are COBOL and FORTRAN versions of the performance programs shipped with 0MQ (local_lat, remote_lat etc.).

I have no desire to document "sockets" in COBOL, but will have a crack at 0MQ in COBOL, subtle difference, I hope!

-- John.Apps at hp.com | +491718691813 | Sent from my HP Personal Computer --

-----Original Message-----
From: zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter Hintjens
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 9:39
To: 0MQ development list
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] 0MQ User Guide

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Apps, John <john.apps at hp.com> wrote:

> COBOL would be my suggestion as the language of choice with PL/I coming in a close second! I volunteer to help out with both as time and inclination permit!
> Sockets in COBOL? Hmm, why on earth not!

We are allowed to use "Cobol" aren't we?  I'd welcome examples in Cobol for the languages section.  If you seriously want to document 0MQ sockets in Cobol, the right place is a language binding page on the web site.

CALL "zmq-recv" USING MESSAGE
DISPLAY MESSAGE.TEXT

lol

-Pieter
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list