[zeromq-dev] zmq_reactor

Matt Weinstein matt_weinstein at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 11 18:57:22 CEST 2010


Folks,

I've pushed a new version of zmq_reactor which fixes the  
zmq_reactor_pair problems, and has test code.

I've also rearranged the samples subdirectory, and there is now a  
zmq_reactor_pair sample.

This has built and tested on a Mac, I'll move to Linux soon .... ;-)

Ilja,

This should fix the concerns with zmq_pair.  When creating a pair, I  
now allocate a "one-time" struct that passes the appropriate data to  
the connecting thread.

This requirement will go away once sockets can be ported between  
threads (but I will probably leave the interface the same since it can  
implement the socket-moving code as required).

Please feel free to send questions -- documents are overdue for this.

Best,

Matt

On Aug 11, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Ilja Golshtein wrote:

> Matt,
> few not very systematical questions about zmq_reactor.
>
> In zmq_reactor_pair ZMR_REQ and ZMQ_PAIR are connected. Is it a  
> typo, or such a combination really possible? How does it work?
>
> The implementation of ZMQ_REACTOR_OPS_* is more or less clear,  
> though could you provide some example usage. What is this technique  
> useful for? When is it necessary to shift _start_ in order to  
> exclude some reactors from poll?
> Don't you afraid these goto-like things lead to ununderstandible code?
>
> If these questions are answered in the List or in a general source  
> of information - I would be happy with a link.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 10.08.10, 21:35, "Matt Weinstein" <matt_weinstein at yahoo.com>:
>
>> (The zmq_reactor library should help a bit here, that's what I'm  
>> using
>> for all this...)
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Ilja Golshtein.
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev




More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list