matt_weinstein at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 11 16:07:43 CEST 2010
On Aug 11, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Matt Weinstein wrote:
> I'm still integrating it into the _first_ system based on this (it's
> noted as lightly tested).
> Unlikely a ZMQ_REQ and PAIR will connect, let me look.
Fixed, sorry. (I have a split dev environment, still trying to pull
everything together between Mac and Linux..)
> If you're speaking of the OPS_ offsets, they're based on similar types
> of models in scatter-gather/IOP chains, although it's just a
> On Aug 11, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Ilja Golshtein wrote:
>> few not very systematical questions about zmq_reactor.
>> In zmq_reactor_pair ZMR_REQ and ZMQ_PAIR are connected. Is it a
>> typo, or such a combination really possible? How does it work?
>> The implementation of ZMQ_REACTOR_OPS_* is more or less clear,
>> though could you provide some example usage. What is this technique
>> useful for? When is it necessary to shift _start_ in order to
>> exclude some reactors from poll?
>> Don't you afraid these goto-like things lead to ununderstandible
>> If these questions are answered in the List or in a general source
>> of information - I would be happy with a link.
>> 10.08.10, 21:35, "Matt Weinstein" <matt_weinstein at yahoo.com>:
>>> (The zmq_reactor library should help a bit here, that's what I'm
>>> for all this...)
>> Best regards,
>> Ilja Golshtein.
>> zeromq-dev mailing list
>> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
More information about the zeromq-dev