[zeromq-dev] Git workflow proposal
ph at imatix.com
Sun Aug 8 18:08:13 CEST 2010
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Peter Alexander <vel.accel at gmail.com> wrote:
> I got confused by "latest stable version" as a descriptor of master branch.
> It detracts from the notion of "to be included in next official release".
Feel free to edit the wiki page with whatever text you think is clearer.
> Not mentioned and possibly to be considered is using the 'tag' feature on
> the master branch for releases and other milestones.
Yes, I'm not sure tags are needed because I'd rather use branches.
Inevitably we need to patch releases.
> The proposal is a very good strong protocol, imho. The only thing I would
> also observe is that the instruction of the inclusion of the MIT license for
> "contributors" was not mentioned there.
We're going to switch to a full LGPL model as soon as there's been
some discussion of http://www.zeromq.org/blog:rfc-0mq-contributions.
More information about the zeromq-dev