[zeromq-dev] Shortest. Introduction. Ever.
sustrik at 250bpm.com
Sun Aug 1 23:04:40 CEST 2010
Matt Weinstein wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>> Uhm, that only makes sense if ZMQ_NOBLOCK is used. A blocking recv()
>> with no filters makes no sense, as you say.
> A multi-socket blocking poll() could legitimately include a ZMQ_SUBS
> with no subscriptions.
> A socket without subscriptions might be waiting for a zmq_term()
More information about the zeromq-dev