[zeromq-dev] Shortest. Introduction. Ever.

[Martin Sustrik]

Matt Weinstein wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> 
>> Uhm, that only makes sense if ZMQ_NOBLOCK is used. A blocking recv() 
>> with no filters makes no sense, as you say.
>>
> NB:
> 
> A multi-socket blocking poll() could legitimately include a ZMQ_SUBS 
> with no subscriptions.
> 
> A socket without subscriptions might be waiting for a zmq_term()

Good point!

Martin