[zeromq-dev] Pull request on atomic ops

Steven McCoy steven.mccoy at miru.hk
Thu Apr 29 09:19:52 CEST 2010


All zeromq2 patches submitted under the MIT license.

-- 
Steve-o

On 29 April 2010 14:05, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:

> Steven,
>
> Great, thanks! Can you state it's submitted under MIT license?
>
> Martin
>
> Steven McCoy wrote:
> > I saw Mato update the atomic ops for adding NetBSD, here is a further
> > update that reads a bit better, maybe.  I tried sending a pull-request
> > on github but the interface appears broken and has now disappeared, no
> idea.
> >
> > * Defer NetBSD atomic ops to GCC builtins.
> > * Revert Sun atomic ops #define
> >
> > http://github.com/steve-o/zeromq2
> >
> > Reviewing the code highlights two points,
> >
> > * Inconsistent use of asm clobber statements, e.g. add defined CC and
> > memory, but sub only defines CC.
> > * Bitmaps on SPARCv9 or AMD64 Solaris will be 32-bit.
> >
> > And damn, those #defines are a mess.
> >
> > --
> > Steve-o
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20100429/9c342d70/attachment.html>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list