[zeromq-dev] equivalent of accept
sustrik at 250bpm.com
Sun Apr 25 22:09:25 CEST 2010
Varol Okan wrote:
> Is there a plan to add some type of timeout to at least the recv() call
> ? From where I stand that would make sense. Otherwise I would have to
> either come up with a timeout mechanism myself or implement a keepalive
> message between client/server ( though I never liked keepalive's ).
Yep. This should be done.
At the moment it can be done by polling on a socket. zmq_poll has
More information about the zeromq-dev