[zeromq-dev] Proposal for 2.0.7: Renaming ZMQ_P2P to ZMQ_PAIR

Brian Granger ellisonbg at gmail.com
Thu Apr 15 20:02:50 CEST 2010


I like PAIR better as it avoids the politically/legally charged "p2p"
connotations.

Cheers,

Brian

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at 250bpm.com> wrote:
> Chuck Remes wrote:
>
>>> Given that the ZMQ_P2P socket is for communication between a PAIR of peers,
>>> the name ZMQ_PAIR is more accurate, and also in line with e.g. POSIX calls
>>> such as socketpair().
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>
>> I think this new name better describes the intent. I like it.
>
> Current P2P socket is still an experimental unfinished feature
> (reconnect is missing etc.) thus changing the name should not be too
> much of annoyance to the users. If people vote in favour of PAIR, let's
> change it.
>
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>



-- 
Brian E. Granger, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Physics
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger at calpoly.edu
ellisonbg at gmail.com



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list