[zeromq-dev] patch: fix malloc/free mismatch in epoll

[Martin Hurton]

On 3/30/09, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at fastmq.com> wrote:
> Martin H.,
>
>
>  > A one liner to fix malloc/free mismatch in epoll.
>  > Not sure if we should add std::nothrow, we don't seem to be using it.
>
>
> Can you please check other polling mechanisms for the same problem?

sure

>
>  As a side note: I believe Dhammika is right in using new/delete rather
>  than malloc/free for fixed-sized objects. So unless there is a good
>  reason to use malloc, let's switch to new now.

OK, I think this will be more C++ like

- Martin
>
>  Martin
>  _______________________________________________
>  zeromq-dev mailing list
>  zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
>  http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>