[zeromq-dev] 0MQ & OpenPGM throughput progress

Apps, John john.apps at hp.com
Thu Mar 19 10:03:49 CET 2009


Yes, very nice results! For those of us that like to collect statistics, do you have a rough diagram of the configuration you used, or just a list of the bits and pieces would also suffice. For example:

Machine configuration (CPU, memory, NIC, ...)
OS version
0MQ version
OpenPGM version
Compilers
...

Cheers, John
---- John Apps | Hewlett-Packard | John.Apps at HP.com | +49 171 869 1813 ----


-----Original Message-----
From: zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org [mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pavol Malosek
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 09:54
To: Steven McCoy
Cc: openpgm-dev at forge.novell.com; zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] 0MQ & OpenPGM throughput progress

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Steven McCoy wrote:

> 2009/3/17 Pavol Malosek <malosek at fastmq.com>:
>> For those which are interested in multicast (OpenPGM) support in 0MQ.
>> There was a big step forward in last few weeks - some "unofficial"
>> throughput results from latest measurements.
>
> Nice, the big question is then how does this fair with Microsoft's PGM stack?

Good point Steven,

I forgot to mention that for the moment 0MQ supports PGM only
at Linux platforms (via OpenPGM which does not have win port).

AFAIK: Windows 0MQ PGM support has high priority and suppose will be
available soon.

malo
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev



More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list