[zeromq-dev] Message processor/filter broadcaster

Pavol Malosek malosek at fastmq.com
Wed Jun 24 00:17:06 CEST 2009


If one msg in not ~MB then 240msg/s is ok.
As for overkill 0MQ is compare to for example OpenAMQ or Qpid easier to
setup and pretty lightweight.
Sure worth to give it a try.


>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Baranski, Antek" <abaranski at ea.com>
>To: "'Pavol Malosek'" <malosek at fastmq.com>; "'zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org'"
<zeromq-dev at mail.imatix.com>
>Cc: "Andrews, Ross" <randrews at ea.com>; "Nystrom, Robert" <rnystrom at ea.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:21 PM
>Subject: RE: [zeromq-dev] Message processor/filter broadcaster

>* I am including 2 engineers from EA who will be working with me on this
>OS will be most probably Linux, language will be Java but could be C++ as
>As for throughput we are expecting to receive on avg. 240 msg per second,
latency is not really an issue as we are not dependent on >a true real-time
>Antek S. Baranski
>Technical Director - Development Transformation
>Work : 604 - 456 - 1746 (x11746)
>Cell : 778 - 668 - 7174
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pavol Malosek [mailto:malosek at fastmq.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:56 AM
>To: Baranski, Antek; 'zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org'
>Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Message processor/filter broadcaster
>Hello Antek,
>It seems to be an ideal use case for 0MQ. If you did not read it yet have
>at butterfly tutorial/example http://www.zeromq.org/tutorials:butterfly,
>be more or less the setup you need.
>Can you please provide throughput and latency needs, OS and prog. language

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list