[zeromq-dev] [openamq-dev] AMQP and WebSphere Low Latency MQ (LLMQ)

[Martin Sustrik]

Actually, we don't know whether 0MQ is faster than LLMQ or not. To get 
relevant statistics we would have to benchmark both products in a 
controlled environment. However, AFAIK IBM license prohibits 
benchmarking the product  :(

As for AIX/HP-UX/OpenVMS support it seems that IBM opted for "buy a 
complete new stack" approach rather than "reuse your existing stack" way 
of doing things. In current economy the latter can prove as a 
considerable advantage IMO.

Martin

Pieter Hintjens wrote:
 > We've seen IBM's low latency product crop up a few times.  This is
 > kind of the space 0MQ is aimed at.  Though 0MQ is faster, open source,
 > and runs on practically everything...
 >
 > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Apps, John <john.apps at hp.com> wrote:
 >> A colleague just sent this along. One of the most fascinating things 
about
 >> the product is that it is not supported on AIX, or on HP-UX for that 
matter,
 >> but is supported on Windows XP and Vista.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> Looks as if there is some PR to be done here?
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> Cheers, John
 >>
 >> ---- John Apps | Hewlett-Packard | John.Apps at HP.com | +49 171 869 
1813 ----
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> _______________________________________________
 >> openamq-dev mailing list
 >> openamq-dev at lists.openamq.org
 >> http://lists.openamq.org/mailman/listinfo/openamq-dev
 >>
 > _______________________________________________
 > openamq-dev mailing list
 > openamq-dev at lists.openamq.org
 > http://lists.openamq.org/mailman/listinfo/openamq-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IBM_fss_fm_wmq_low_latency_messaging_v2.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 352432 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20090217/3efb8b0b/attachment.pdf>