[zeromq-dev] 0MQ packages - call for comments!

[Martin Sustrik]

Pavol Malosek wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Lemenkov" <lemenkov at gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] 0MQ packages - call for comments!
> 
> 
>>> Addons:
>>> manual pages: yes
>>> performance tests: no
>>> camera example: no
>>> stock exchange example: no
>>> chartoom example: no
>>> butterfly example: no
>>
>> Agree.
>>
> 
> Then we should have zeromq-addons-X.Y package with examples, that users 
> can "touch" 0MQ quickly.

zeromq-examples rather? And it should be a source package rather then a 
binary package.

>>> Language bindings can be delivered as separate packages:
>>>
>>> C language binding: yes
>>> Python language binding: yes
>>> Java language binding: yes
>>> CLR binding: yes
> 
> I would go with C binding in zeromq-core package since there is no 
> significant dependency.

Packaging some of the language binding with the core package and others 
by their own is kind of ugly. What's the rationale?

> zeromq-python-X.Y, zeromq-java-X.Y and zeromq-mono-X.Y should be 
> packages for python, java and clr bindings - as Dirk proposed.

Martin