[zeromq-dev] patch: handle idle connections

[Dhammika Pathirana]

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik at fastmq.com> wrote:
> Hi Dhammika,
>
> I wonder why my previous email haven't appeared in the mailing list. I hope
> this one will fare better...
>


I got two replies though


>> Wouldn't it add more overhead to maintain index consistency?
>> Basically every swap will need two additional operations to update
>> indexes.
>> I guess it'll depend on the use case. If we have lot of long running
>> instances then it'll work great.
>> But if we have pipes that come and go, then I'm not sure.
>
> No idea. However, O(n) is not an option. Let's do O(1) first, then run the
> perf tests. If the performance impact is severe, let's address the problem
> afterwards.
>


oki, I'll add this.


> Martin
>