[zeromq-dev] Best practice
Martin Sustrik
sustrik at fastmq.com
Thu Apr 9 23:39:02 CEST 2009
Todd,
> Impressive, your queue beat my queue by a significant margin. Here
are the numbers on a pretty weak box
Nice, here's the same thing converted into nanoseconds required to
process one message:
> Raw-No queue in between- 625586.487332 Msg/sec
1599 ns/msg
> 0MQ-1 source- 590318.772137 Msg/sec
1694 ns/msg - overhead of 95 nanoseconds
> My Old queue-433369.447454 Msg/sec
2308 ns/msg - overhead of 709 nanoseconds
The boost tends to be more dramatic on multicore boxes than on single
core ones. So, it you've tested it on a single-core box, you'll probably
get even better result on a multicore one.
Martin
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list