[zeromq-dev] (remote/local)_lat.cpp versus the other languages

[Michael Greene]

Maybe I am missing something, but is there a reason why remote_lat and
local_lat seem to be switched in the cpp versions compared to the
other languages?  This is particularly confusing because this is the
version any documentation discusses, but when one attempts to
experiment with the other languages the performance test calls are
reversed.

I am glad to see that the CLR binding works well under Mono, though.

Michael