[zeromq-dev] Preliminary results of voting

Shahbaz Chaudhary schaudhary at genghisfund.com
Tue Sep 2 18:31:19 CEST 2008

I just started following this project, so please excuse me if I missed
something obvious.
I want to make a point about Excel as well.  It is extremely helpful to
real-time data into excel easily.  In the financial industry, it can
make or break projects run by small trading teams.

I have mainly been using the Java broker from the Qpid project.  I
submitted an RTD server for their broker, although it is nowhere near
production ready (I'm not a C#/windows programmer).

As I understand it, 0MQ is based on the AMQ protocol.  Why not work with
the Qpid and RabbitMQ folks and share work on client APIs?

-----Original Message-----
From: zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org
[mailto:zeromq-dev-bounces at lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 5:21 AM
To: Hak Mem
Cc: zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Preliminary results of voting

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Hak Mem <while1hak at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would posit that conferring longevity (open source immortality?) on
> 0MQ is a far more critical goal.

Great comments.

I think open source, especially GPL'd source, is hard to kill, it can
die from irrelevance, so making 0MQ relevant seems the most critical
thing.  Sometimes firms will buy out and shut down 'dangerous' open
source projects.  But then the community can take the source code and
fork it.  Open source immortality, as you describe it.

As you say, traders seem glued to Excel, which makes Windows and
topics and RTD a compelling bunch of functionality.  Are you
suggesting that making 0MQ work well on the desktop will encourage
firms to use it for distribution of data to the edges of the network?
So then there would need to be bridges from existing messaging
products to 0MQ as well?

zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org

More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list