[zeromq-dev] Mb vs. MB in tests & on the Wiki

[Holger Hoffstätte]

Hi,

I was just having some more fun with the zmq examples when I noticed that
all the tests and also the Wiki use [Mb] for throughput. Not to be overly
pedantic but unless I'm mistaken that should probably be [MB] since it's
megabytes, not -bits. My poor little box is slow but it's certainly better
than ~60 MB/sec over loopback. ;)

Oh and yeah.. ~30 us latency with a stock 2.6.27 kernel (that's a _tenth_
of Java-to-Rabbit??) and >600 MB throughput over loopback is nothing short
of awesome, considering this is on my 6 years old single-core box.
Great job!

Holger