[zeromq-dev] 3.x zmq_msg_t change proposal
ph at imatix.com
Thu Oct 27 22:58:52 CEST 2011
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist at mac.com> wrote:
> And looking at ZMQ_RCVMORE and how it is used, I'm not convinced this should be a property of the socket either.
Indeed. This was one of my change proposals for 3.x. It's how CZMQ
does it on zframe.
> I looked back through all of the message threads from the past 1+ years where RCVMORE was discussed (it was introduced around April 2010). I could not see any reason given for why it had to be a socket property.
It was historically meant to simplify the API afair.
Your proposal is great, yes.
More information about the zeromq-dev