[zeromq-dev] Indefinite Retention and Durable Sockets
gregory.szorc at gmail.com
Sun Oct 16 00:37:55 CEST 2011
On 10/15/2011 1:15 PM, Ian Barber wrote:
> The logic around this is basically why durable socket on these types
> have been removed in 3.0 - the change is big enough it can't be done
> in the 2.x branches however. I guess the question is whether it's
> worth adding extra functionality of the type you described or waiting
> until 3.0 becomes stable.
I didn't realize durable sockets had been removed in 3.0. I'm very glad
to hear it!
More information about the zeromq-dev