[zeromq-dev] protocol design question
ph at imatix.com
Wed Nov 16 18:46:51 CET 2011
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist at mac.com> wrote:
> This would require the Client portion of the protocol to include a READY-type message so it could be assigned an ID by the Broker. I'll look at this.
Something like that. There are also arguments against broker-assigned
identifiers, mainly if brokers restart and thousands of clients all
demand new identities at the same time, it can be painful. But if
clients are assumed to cache their identities, not a problem.
I'd recommend pushing whatever you have as text to the RFC wiki so we
can discuss tangibles.
More information about the zeromq-dev