dln at eintr.org
Tue Nov 8 14:22:26 CET 2011
As user of both 2.1 and 3.0.x, another +1 for Option 2. Changing
existing code isn't too bad, and 2-1 compatibility is great.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:05, gonzalo diethelm <gdiethelm at dcv.cl> wrote:
>> > Option 2 makes me happy that I could progress some time without
>> > massive effort.
>> > So I'm another voice for Option 2.
>> +1 from me.
> For whatever it is worth, me too.
> Gonzalo Diethelm
> DCV Chile
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
More information about the zeromq-dev