[zeromq-dev] NYSE OpenMAMA
sustrik at 250bpm.com
Wed Nov 2 23:49:28 CET 2011
On 11/02/2011 09:44 PM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
> Now when I've first seen AMQP I've said: "finally a protocol which
> is both simple, flexible and implementable"
Have you seen AMQP/1.0?
> So from what I've seen on OpenMAMA page, they go back to an API
> based standard, thus allowing API "extensions" to cripple any window
> of portability... Why??? (It's just like instead of having HTTP, IETF
> would have defined an API and made it "pluggable"...)
It's not like MAMA is a new ground-breaking technology meant to replace
the existing messaging solutions.
First, it've been around for some time already.
Second, it's a niche solution to abstract different messaging products
in the context of stock trading industry. Obviously, with existing
proprietary software to deal with, it has to define API rather than a
> P.P.S.: BTW, ZeroMQ can also be criticized as being API based --
> as there is limited documentation about the protocol -- but
> fortunately it's quite easy to implement your own "sockets". (Or at
> least this is what I think after reading the related "unprotocol".)
There's an initiative to standardise a protocol for distributed
messaging, but it'll take some time to make it ready:
More information about the zeromq-dev