[zeromq-dev] "Broadcast" messages for PUSH-PULL sockets?
Andrew Hume
andrew at research.att.com
Mon Mar 14 16:22:40 CET 2011
i use the scheme of having the workers report status back via a PUSH-PULL to the
source (or control process). then pump down no-op data until all workers report no-ops.
On Mar 14, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Timothy Shead wrote:
> When streaming a fixed quantity of data through a pipeline via PUSH-PULL
> sockets, I find myself wanting to signal all of the downstream workers
> when the input data has been exhausted. To do that, I have to send my
> "finished" message multiple times, which means that each upstream PUSHer
> must be explicitly configured to know how many downstream PULLers there
> will be, which spreads-around knowledge of the pipeline topology and
> introduces lots of complexity, e.g. waiting for every PULLer to connect,
> etc. Is there an easier way to "broadcast" a message to every PULL
> socket connected to a PUSH? Using a separate PUB-SUB connection seems
> equally problematic - I'm assuming that there's no guarantee that a
> published "finished" message would arrive after the last data message in
> the PUSH-PULL connection.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Tim
>
> --
> Timothy M. Shead
> Sandia National Laboratories
> 1461, Scalable Analysis and Visualization
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
------------------
Andrew Hume (best -> Telework) +1 623-551-2845
andrew at research.att.com (Work) +1 973-236-2014
AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and LOPSA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20110314/54f9dae8/attachment.htm
More information about the zeromq-dev
mailing list