[zeromq-dev] NEWS: Git 'master' is now 2.1.x development

Chris Wong chris at chriswongstudio.com
Tue Nov 2 21:31:37 CET 2010


Hi,

Hi,

I'm starting a project to migrate existing messaging code to ZeroMQ.   The
new zmq_close/term() semantic in 2.1 is important for this project.  Do we
already have a rough roadmap on approximately when 2.1 will be out of beta?
 Any guesstimate is better than nothing. :-)

Thanks
Chris

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Martin Lucina <mato at kotelna.sk> wrote:

> We will announce a more detailed roadmap for 2.1.x shortly, in the mean
> time here's a quick list for those of you who have not been following the
> changes on the 'wip-shutdown' topic branch and/or sustrik's zeromq2
> repository of the changes that have now gone into 'master':
>
>
<snip...>


>  - The new zmq_close() semantics should implement the behaviour discussed
>   at:
>
>    http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2010-July/004244.html
>
>   Specifically, zmq_close() is now deterministic and while it still returns
>   immediately, it does not discard any data that may still be queued for
>   sending. Further, zmq_term() will now block until all outstanding data
> has
>   been sent.
>
> The dependencies for the above are a fairly large infrastructure rewrite,
> so we expect that 'master' is quite buggy now, please test and report
> issues making it clear that those are related to 2.1.x and not 2.0.x.
>
> As per the policy discussions earlier, the plan is that 2.1.x will remain
> compatible with 2.0.x at the API level.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -mato
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev at lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/attachments/20101102/8c80dda8/attachment.html>


More information about the zeromq-dev mailing list