[zeromq-dev] [otish] "Why ZeroMQ"
oliver at kfs.org
Tue Jul 27 15:03:20 CEST 2010
On 7/27/2010 6:07 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> And these names still don't say anything at all about the pattern,
> which is load balancing and fair queuing...
> How about FANOUT and FANIN, which combine the notion of in/out with
> the notion of distribution and collecting?
Don't beat about the bush ... Retain the current names, but alias as
sendSocket = ctx.socket(ZMQ_PIPELINE_OUT)
More information about the zeromq-dev